When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

피고인은 2019. 12. 4. 01:20경 서울 영등포구 B에 있는 C지구대 앞 노상에서, 음주소란으로 인한 112신고를 받고 현장에 출동한 C지구대 소속 경찰관인 경장 D 등 경찰관들을 향해 욕설을 하며 담배꽁초를 바닥에 던지다가 위 경찰관들이 쓰레기투기 등을 이유로 통고처분을 하자, 이에 화가 나 ‘이 싸가지 없는 새끼 봐라. 계급장 떼고 맞짱 뜨던가’라며 시비를 걸다가 휴대전화를 손에 들고 피고인의 모습을 촬영하는 위 D에게 다가가 ‘씨발 넌 찍지 말고’라고 말하며 위 D의 손을 쳐 112신고 처리 및 범죄수사 등에 관한 정당한 공무집행을 방해하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the police statement law to D;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 136 (1) of the Selection of Punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act include the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, intelligence and environment; (b) motive, means and consequence of the commission of the crime; and (c) the same type of punishment as the order, taking into account all the sentencing conditions prescribed in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, such as

D. Unfavorable circumstances: It is judged as above on the ground that assaulting a police officer in uniform and obstructing the performance of official duties is highly likely to be subject to criticism due to the power of the public authority, and circumstances favorable to the fact that the damaged police officer did not receive any tolerance from the police officer: The first crime without any previous conviction, the first crime seems to be likely to contribute to the state and society in the future, the degree of assault is relatively minor, and the depth of mistake is divided.