However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

1. On July 17, 2020, the Defendant suffered special injury on the road in front of the “C cafeteria” in the “C cafeteria” in the “Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si, on the ground that he did not speak the victim D (35 years of age, n) with other males of the victim D (the victim Doese 35 years of age, n) and did not drink with the other male, her face once a week, the victim taken twice the victim’s face with his hair back to the floor, and her walked twice the victim’s hand, the victim her hand her her son, and her her son her her son her hand at one time. At around 20:40 on the same day on the same day, the Defendant committed assault to the victim, such as the victim’s hair and her head with the object dangerous from the 2nd floor of Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si, and caused injury to the victim for about three weeks.

2. Around July 17, 2020, the Defendant damaged a gallon 7 mobile phone that is the market price owned by the victim by destroying the amount of the victim’s cell phone from the 2nd floor of the victim D’s residence in the Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si, by leaving the victim’s cell phone on the floor and taking the victim’s cell phone by spreading the victim’s cell phone.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to subordinate statutes of small-scale soldiers and photographs of damaged articles;

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) (the point of special injury) of the Criminal Act and Article 366 of the Criminal Act (the point of damage to property and the choice of imprisonment) concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act to mitigate small amount;

1. It is necessary to strictly punish the Defendant inasmuch as the nature of each of the crimes of this case is not good for each of the crimes of this case, such as inflicting bodily injury on the victim due to a major illness, which is an object dangerous to the reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence.

However, the fact that the defendant recognizes each of the crimes of this case, that the defendant agreed with the victim smoothly after the conclusion of the pleadings, and that there is no other criminal punishment than a fine once.