손해배상(기)
1. The plaintiff's appeal is all dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Purport of claim and appeal
The first instance court.
1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case are as follows: ① evidence No. 8, evidence No. 30, evidence No. 31, and evidence No. 31 to 9 are added to the evidence No. 8, evidence No. 30, and evidence No. 8 of the first instance court's judgment; ② The testimony No. 3 of the third of the second of the third of the third of the third of the fourth is as follows: (i) the testimony No. 9 and evidence No. 29 of the first instance court's judgment "No. 3" are as follows: (iii) the testimony No. 9 and evidence No. 29 of the second of the 9th of the 15th of the 9th of the 15th of the 9th of the 15th of the 15th of the 19th of the 2015.
(5) No. 11 shall be added to the following 2.B:
The paragraph shall be added, and 6 in Part 13, 11, : 7, 7, 16, 13, 5, 5, 5, 12, 12, 5, 12, 5, 5, and 12, 5, 5, 11, 5, 11, 5, 11, 5, 11, 5, 12, 5, 12, 5, 5, 12, 5, 5, 5, 10
In addition to adding a claim, it is identical to the entry of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
2. The addition;
A. The Plaintiff asserts that, on the premise that both consortiums were integrated, ① the integrated two consortiums succeed to the obligation to pay the design service cost to the Plaintiff, or ② the Plaintiff’s integrated two consortiums have the right to claim restitution of unjust enrichment or the right to claim reimbursement of the cost due to business management, Defendant Hyundai Industrial Development, a member of the integrated two consortiums, must perform the above obligation to succeed, the obligation to return unjust enrichment, or the obligation to reimburse the cost.