However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. Around August 21, 2013, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (measures to be taken after an accident) (hereinafter referred to as the “Road Traffic Act”), which is a business of driving D E-coo vehicle, and operated D-coo vehicle in front of a door post office 354-2 located in E-coo-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri).

2. On August 8, 2013, at around 21:25, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (refluence of the measurement of drinking level) on the roads near the tending 703-23 pacta of the Gyeonggi Pyeong-gun, the Defendant was required to comply with a drinking test by inserting the alcohol measuring instrument three times in the face, on the grounds that there are reasonable grounds to recognize that the Defendant was driving while under the influence of alcohol, such as making a breath on the face of the police box called out after receiving a report of 112 on traffic accidents as stipulated in paragraph (1), the Defendant was unable to comply with a request for a drinking test by a police officer without justifiable grounds.

3. Obstruction of performance of official duties and the Defendant: (a) the victim G (the 37 years of age) who is the police box belonging to the F police box requests the measurement of drinking alcohol at the time and place specified in paragraph (2) of the above Article; (b) the victim’s left side arm.