However, for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive, the above sentence shall be executed.

1. Defendant A: (a) around 10:00 on July 4, 2014, on the ground that the victim B, a workplace volunteer, did not process the work as soon as possible, and (b) took part in the victim’s face face on one occasion, the victim was injured by the victim, i.e., the head of the household, by drinking up approximately eight weeks of treatment.

2. At the above time and place, Defendant B put the victim up against the above act of the victim A by setting up the victim, and then put the victim up the face at approximately 5-6 times in drinking, and led the victim to the face of the victim in need of approximately 3 weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police interrogation protocol against the Defendants

1. The police statement of H;

1. Each photograph;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each injury diagnosis certificate and diagnosis certificate;

1. Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act; Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act; Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act; Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act; Selection of fines;

1. Defendant B of detention in a workhouse: Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant A: Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant B: The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is that Defendant A [type of crime] Defendant A] for the reason of sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act; the general injury (special person) mitigated element - the general injury (special person) mitigated element of punishment - the basic area of injury [the scope of territory and recommendation] - one year and six months [the general person] mitigated element of imprisonment from April to six months] - there is no record of criminal punishment [the decision of sentence] - 2 years of suspended sentence of imprisonment for August 8, 199] - the above sentencing factors and the Defendant recognized their mistake; the part and degree of the injury suffered by the victim; the Defendant’s mistake was recognized; the Defendant agreed smoothly with the victim; the Defendant did not have any specific criminal power in Korea; and the parts and parts of the injury suffered by the victim.