2. The judgment of the court below seems to have led to the confession and reflect of the crime, and all victims did not want the punishment of the defendant before the sentence of the court below (as agreed amount, approximately KRW 18 million is required). There is no criminal record of the same kind, and there is only a fine for criminal punishment.

There is also a situation in which family members and branch members appeal the ship's wife.

However, the criminal liability of the defendant is not against the law.

The harm of the crime committed is very significant in that it causes confusion in the order of the second trading, and the criminal proceeds of the defendant are very large.

The crime was committed with awareness that it was a type of crime causing social controversy.

Considering the equity of many similar sentencing precedents.

The court of the court below rendered the sentence against the defendant by taking account of the aforementioned various positive and negative circumstances.

The judgment below

There is no new circumstance that can be considered in sentencing as a result of the sentence.

In addition, in full view of various sentencing conditions stipulated in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, such as the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, motive, means, and consequence of the commission of the crime, the circumstances before and after the commission of the crime, it shall not be deemed that the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable.

3. Thus, the defendant's appeal is not reasonable, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act.