However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. Embezzlement;

A. A. On April 21, 2011, the Defendant was commissioned to purchase BM passenger cars from the victim C who was known to the usual level at Yongsan-gu Seoul Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Franbya, and was kept in custody with KRW 1,920,000 as the down payment. Around that time, the Defendant embezzled the BM passenger car by voluntarily consuming it for living expenses, etc. in Seoul Japan.

B. Around January 2012, the Defendant sold a k5 car owned by the victim C on behalf of the victim C to the middle and high-speedr for the victim C, and then embezzled the money for the victim C. Around that time, he/she voluntarily consumed the money for divorce, living expenses, etc. in Seoul, Japan around that time.

2. Fraud against the victim C;

A. On September 22, 2011, the Defendant issued KRW 14.5 million from the victim, on behalf of the victim C, to the victim C, on the following grounds: (a) on behalf of the victim C, the Defendant did not have the intent or ability to purchase the BMW car on behalf of the victim C; (b) “In order to purchase the BMW car, it is necessary to raise any money; and (c) the Defendant was issued KRW 14.5 million from the victim.”

Accordingly, the defendant was given a delivery of 14.5 million won by deceiving the victim.

B. Around March 5, 2012, the Defendant, on behalf of the victim C, was issued KRW 5,80,000 from the victim, on the ground that “BW was purchased” to the victim C despite having no intent or capacity to buy the BM car on behalf of the victim C, and that “the purchase of the BMW was necessary. The registration fee, balance, vehicle color additional expenses, etc. are needed.”

Accordingly, the defendant was given a delivery of 5.8 million won by deceiving the victim.

3. The Defendant violated the thief and Specialized Credit Financial Business Act, around June 1, 2012, went to the residence of the victim C of the Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government E building 106 dong 503 dong 106 dong 503, and 3 copies of the credit card owned by the victim on television in which the victim's surveillance was neglected.