건물인도 등
1. Defendant A shall deliver to Defendant B the buildings listed in the separate sheet.
2. The defendant B is ordered by the defendant A.
1. Facts of recognition;
A. The Plaintiff is a creditor of indemnity amount due to the subrogation of Defendant A on November 26, 2014. The Plaintiff filed an application with Defendant A for an order to pay the amount of indemnity amount with the Seoul East Eastern District Court on March 4, 2016, to pay the amount of indemnity amount to the Plaintiff KRW 25,534,449 and KRW 21,580,686, whichever is earlier, was determined as follows: “The foregoing decision became final and conclusive: (a) from November 26, 2014 to January 31, 2016; (b) 12% per annum from February 1, 2016 to March 8, 2016; and (c) 15% per annum from the next day to the date of full payment.”
B. Defendant A leased the building listed in the separate sheet from Defendant B from KRW 100,000,00, monthly rent of KRW 500,000, and the lease period from October 23, 2014 to October 23, 2016.
On January 2016, the Plaintiff filed an application for provisional attachment against Defendant A for the claim for the return of the above lease deposit against Defendant B as the preserved right. On January 25, 2016, the Plaintiff received the order of provisional attachment against the claim under Sungwon District Court Sung-nam Branch 2015 on January 25, 2016, and the said order was served on Defendant B on February 29, 2016.
When the decision to request a payment order against the defendant A became final and conclusive, the plaintiff applied for a seizure and collection order of the above 2016Kadan60115 to transfer the provisional seizure of the above 2015 claims to the provisional seizure of the provisional seizure of the claims, and received a seizure and collection order of the above 28,283,216 won among the claims due to the above provisional seizure order as of April 5, 2016, the Suwon District Court rendered a provisional seizure of the above 28,283,216 won to the principal seizure, and seized the remaining 770,457 won. The plaintiff was issued a seizure and collection order that the above 201
【Ground of Recognition 【Plaintiffs and Defendant A: Confession of Confession, the fact that there is no dispute between the Plaintiff and Defendant B, and the purport of the whole pleadings.
2. According to the above-mentioned recognition, it is apparent that the lease contract for the building listed in the attached list between the defendant A and the defendant B has expired, and it is apparent that it has expired.