beta
(영문) 창원지방법원 통영지원 2015.07.02 2015고단428

사기등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On January 2014, the Defendant violated the Employment Security Act: (a) at the office of “C”, a human resources supplier company located at macro-si B, and (b) at the office of “C”, a person who intends to conduct domestic fee-charging job placement services, without registering with the competent authority; (c) posted a job offer advertisement to the employment-related Internet container, such as “racult,” thereby soliciting nine workers, including D, and (d) E, a cooperation company at E and the employees recruited by the Defendant, after arranging the employment contract to be formed between the employees recruited, the Defendant received KRW 568,500,000 from the amount calculated by multiplying the number of working days of the employees recruited by 120,000,000 won actually received from E; and (d) from around that time to June 2014, the Defendant recruited workers by the same method as indicated in the attached list of crimes, and arranged (ju and employment contracts to be formed, and paid KRW 19,50,750,00.

2. Around October 27, 2014, the defrauded made a false statement to the effect that “G” located in G in Sast City F, and the Defendant’s wife operates the Moel and gas station in Ulsan Island, etc., to the victim H, thereby emphasizing the fluence. In addition, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “I company is the president of the I company, and there is a need to pay 10 million won in advance due to a large number of employees, and 10 million won in advance. The payment for the completed portion will be paid within 10 days.”

However, in 197, the Defendant was not able to repay the debt of KRW 1 billion, and thereafter, the Defendant exceeded KRW 00,000,000,000. The Defendant did not have any intent or ability to repay the borrowed money from the victim even if he was paid the money in the name of the progress payment from the Customer because the expenditure, such as operating expenses, etc. of the office is a large amount of revenue.

The defendant deceivings the victim to do so.

참조조문