Text

1. The defendant's appeal and the plaintiff's incidental appeal are all dismissed.

Reasons

1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning the instant case by the court of first instance are to delete "the plaintiff had been in military service" No. 2, No. 8 of the judgment of the court of first instance, and No. 6, No. 1, and No. 3, "from the end of September 2013, which was subsequent to the date of the instant criminal act, there is no evidence to acknowledge that the plaintiff had not been residing in the instant self-employed room," which read "from the end of September 2013, which was after the date of the instant criminal act, the evidence submitted by the plaintiff alone was insufficient to deem that the plaintiff had not been staying in the instant self-employed room from the end of September 2013, which was after the date of the instant criminal act, and there is no other evidence to prove otherwise, it is difficult to regard that the date of pronouncement of the judgment" No. 17 as "the date of pronouncement of the judgment of the court of first instance" as "the date of pronouncement of the judgment of the court of first instance".