A. Of the 3174 square meters of C forest land in Pakistan, indication 54, 62, 61, 60, 59, 58, 57, 56, 55 of the annexed drawings.

A. The Plaintiff is the owner of the instant land 1 and 2, and the Defendant is the owner of the instant land 3134 square meters adjacent to the instant land 1 and 2.

B. Of the instant land 1, the entrance of this case is installed on the line that connects each point of 71 and 72 in sequence. Of the instant land, the part on “inboard” connecting each point of 63, 73, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 64, and 64 square meters in sequence and 63, 61, 60, 59, 57, 56, 54, 54, 1, 2, 3, 54, 73, and 64 square meters in sequence, among the instant land 1, the part on the instant land, which is 64 square meters in order and is 65 square meters in size, 70, 76, 74, 57, 57, 54, 56, 57, 54, 73, and 63, the part on the instant land, which is 147, 7, 7, 7, or 744.

(2) The court below held that the land of the above part of the "B", "C", "D", "F", and "g" for the plaintiff's transfer shall be "land of this case" and the case of this case (hereinafter "road of this case") and when the land of this part is indicated together with the case of this case (the ground for recognition") / [the road of this case] / there is no dispute

2. The Defendant’s judgment on the instant lawsuit is unlawful on the ground that there was a defect in the procedure at the ordinary meeting of the shareholders on April 20, 2013, which was decided to institute the instant lawsuit.