However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

피고인은 2019. 7. 27. 00:45경 구미시 B 아파트 정문 앞에서, ‘택시기사인데, 손님과 시비가 있다.’는 내용의 112 신고를 받고 출동한 구미경찰서 C파출소 소속 경찰관인 경장 D, 순경 E이 신고자 등을 상대로 신고 내용을 조사한다는 이유로 위 E에게 ‘씹할 놈아. 짭새들은 빠져라.’라고 욕설하면서 손으로 E의 가슴 부위를 1회 밀치고, 머리로 가슴 부위를 1회 들이받고, 계속하여 이를 제지하던 D의 가슴 부위를 머리로 1회 들이받아 폭행하였다.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of reports and maintenance of order by police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of the E, D, and F;

1. Other closure photographs;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing police officials' identification cards and working places;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The main sentence of Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 (1) of the Criminal Act of the community service order;

1. Scope of applicable sentences under law: One to five years of imprisonment;

2. The scope of the recommended sentence according to the sentencing guidelines [decision of types] the obstruction of the performance of official duties [Type 1]/ the coercion of official duties [the scope of the recommended area and the recommended punishment] There is no person [the person who is a special person] (the scope of the recommended area and the recommended punishment] basic area, six months to one year and six months [the person who is a general person] [the grounds for suspension of execution] - The grounds for suspension of execution of general pride: There is no criminal

3. In addition to the elements of the above sentencing, the fact that there is no previous conviction or fine exceeding the same criminal records or fine, confession and reflect, etc.