However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

The defendant is a driver of a private taxi.

At around 08:30 on September 18, 2014, the Defendant returned the said taxi driven by the Defendant, and obstructed the legitimate execution of duties concerning the instruction of students, etc. of the above E, who is a public middle school teacher, as a public middle school teacher, for the sake of the safety of students, the victim E (the age of 51) at the above school D, who provided guidance to teach students, was holding the cab of the Defendant for the sake of the safety of students, while driving the cab with the Defendant, was sprinking the body of the victim by sprinking the sprink of the victim with his hand and pushed the body of the victim with his hand, and pushed the body of the victim in a sprink and the sprinked sponsed splate for about two weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each police statement of the E, F, and G;

1. Each statement of H and I;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Articles 257 (1) and 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act, Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act, the choice of sentence and punishment;

1. It shall be decided as per the disposition on the grounds of not less than Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (a minor and contingent crime in the degree of injury);