except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 23:00 on July 12, 2014, the Defendant, at the main point of “D” located in Suwon-gu, Gyeonggi-gu, Gyeonggi-do, with five employees, such as the victim E (43 years of age) and performed drinking. On the ground that under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant, on the ground of the fact that the bread, under the influence of alcohol, engaged in the injury, such as tearing the victim’s head, one time by an empty beer, which is a dangerous object on the table and continuously dangerous object, with the part of the victim’s head, one time, and one time at the left part of the victim’s head, where the victim’s treatment days cannot be known.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement of E;

1. A written statement;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Article 3 (1) and Article 2 (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning the crime, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Mitigation of discretionary work and mitigation under Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (including the fact that the error of self-defense is pened, the fact that there is no special criminal record in addition to the fine, and the fact that an agreement has been reached with the victim, etc.);

1. Reasons for the suspended sentence under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (including persons who have been specially punished): The factors for mitigation of punishment (including serious efforts to recover damage) or cases where considerable damage has been recovered (the scope of recommending punishment). From June to June 2: