Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

On November 2016, the Defendant damaged the property of the victim in the city due to the fact that, in Seoul Mapo-gu Seoul, the Victim C used the pentular pole installed on behalf of the Victim C in a dub, and then extracted the pentular pole under the bottom of the pentular pole.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. C’s legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement regarding C;

1. In light of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence mentioned above, the victim’s statement can be made reliable, and there is no fact of destruction. In light of the fact that the victim made a concrete and consistent statement from the investigative agency to the present court, the victim made a statement of the damage as stated in its reasoning, ② the victim’s photograph taken on the cell phone at the time of the instant case also recognized the fact that the pents pole was damaged (see photographs attached to the complaint) and the Defendant also recognized that the pents pole was the same as that at the time of the instant case, the victim’s statement can be made reliable, and the Defendant is recognized as a criminal liability as stated in its reasoning).

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 366 of the Selection of Punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;