명예훼손
The defendant is innocent.
1. The summary of the facts charged was the chairman of the council of occupants' representatives (hereinafter referred to as the "council of occupants' representatives") at the time of the show, and the victim C was the head of the above apartment management office.
Around March 3, 2017, the Defendant received a request from the auditor to request data from the council of occupants' representatives at the office of the above apartment apartment, and the fact is not that the victim acquired a residual business allowance or an electrical inspection allowance, even though the victim did not have acquired it, the Defendant shall obtain it by deception on July 30, 2017, by requesting 350,000 won of the residual business allowance;
8. 30. 30. 30. Balance sheet 4.20,000 won request, thereby impairing the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out false facts by submitting a printed article indicating false facts, such as fraud and deception of electrical inspection allowances, to be used as a meeting material.
2. Determination
A. According to the evidence duly examined and adopted, the following facts are recognized.
1) At the time of the instant case, the Defendant received a request from the auditor D of the council of occupants’ representatives to provide data to the victim. In particular, the Defendant was requested to explain the fact that remaining job allowances were paid in addition to monthly wage, and that the aforementioned inspection allowances were paid directly to the victim. Accordingly, the Defendant prepared one copy of the instant printed material, and read the content thereof at the council of occupants’ representatives on March 3, 2017. The Defendant sent all printed material to the Chairperson, and the Defendant was absent from the meeting room on the books of the council of occupants’ representatives located in the meeting room.
3) Meanwhile, the C’s labor contract states that “the monthly salary, including legal allowances, is KRW 2,700,000,000,000,000,000. 4) The management office prepared an allowance of other employees, including the victim’s remaining working allowances, in one written approval. The Defendant raised an objection against the victim’s remaining working allowances as the chairman of the council of occupants’ representatives, and returned it to