2) The office of the instant officetel management, which was delegated by the Plaintiff, was taking the measures of cutting-down of the above 202, and the Defendant, around January 15, 2008, agreed to pay the Plaintiff KRW 2,00,000 to the Plaintiff instead of suspending the measures of cutting-out of the instant officetel D and the above-mentioned cutting-out, and to pay the remainder of the management expenses later. (iii) Accordingly, the Defendant, upon the same day, prepared to the head of the instant officetel management office D and the instant officetel management office as follows (Evidence 4-1, 6; hereinafter referred to as the “each of the instant documents”).

In * Address* Address : 10,710,720, 100, 200, 200, 200, 202, 10,000, 200, 200,000, 200,000,000, 200,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000

1) In addition, around October 2010, the Defendant had a duty to pay the Plaintiff the unpaid management expenses and late payment fees until October 2010 related to the instant officetel 201 and 205. (2) The instant officetel management office took measures against the instant officetel 201 and 205 with respect to the instant officetel 205. On October 31, 2010, the Defendant prepared a settlement pledge (Evidence 5-1; hereinafter “the instant settlement statement”) with respect to unpaid management expenses, etc. to the instant officetel management office (hereinafter “the instant settlement statement”) as follows, on the ground that the Defendant had the burden of paying the Plaintiff for the unpaid management expenses, etc. by September 2005, 2005 among the management expenses under the above 201 to the sale company: < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 22426, Oct. 31, 2010>