However, it is against the Defendants for two years from the date of the final judgment.

1. On December 13, 2013, at around 22:50, Defendant A, along with the victim B (n, 54 years of age) who was aware of Furburher 508 in Seo-gu, Daegu, Seo-gu, about 508, performed alcohol, and the victim drinked three times the victim's face at his house on the ground that the victim performed his/her work at his/her house, and was an empty beer who was in danger of drinking three times the victim's face at his/her house, resulting in injury to the victim, by taking care of the victim's head at his/her house, such as the burg, the burine, the inside part, and the examination.

2. The Defendant B, at the above temporary border and the above place, suffered from the victim A (the 55 years of age)’s injury due to an empty beer disease as seen above by the Defendant, and the victim’s injury caused to the victim’s loss due to an empty beer, which is a dangerous thing against this, the number of days of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Application of each police interrogation protocol to the Defendants - Defendants

1. Article 3 (1) and Article 2 (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning the crime, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;