2. Although the Defendant’s mistake is divided, the nature of each of the crimes of this case committed in collusion by several persons is not good, the crime was committed during the repeated crime period as indicated in the judgment of the court below, the victims did not recover from damage to the victim up to the trial, and all of the sentencing records in the records of this case including the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, and environment, the sentence of the court below is appropriate, and is not unduly unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.

However, the judgment of the court below is clearly stated that "1...... the statement of accomplice D and C decision is omitted" in the list of evidence, and such addition is corrected in accordance with Article 25 of the Rules on Criminal Procedure.

.