추가상이 처 인정거부 처분 취소
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. Details of the disposition;
A. On July 31, 1982, the Plaintiff entered the Army and was discharged from military service on January 17, 1983 by serving in the 50 Assistant Soldiers.
B. On October 6, 2008, the Plaintiff asserted that the Defendant was faced with an accident that causes shock in a gun (hereinafter “instant accident”) after entering the military, and applied for registration of a person who rendered distinguished services to the State on the ground of his application for the “on the left top self-conscept and the right extension”, but the Defendant issued a disposition to refuse to provide distinguished services to the State on February 19, 2009 by filing an administrative litigation (Tgu District Court 2010-Gu District Court 2010-gu 561) and recognized that the “inscept in the opposite side (except tuberculosis)” was wounded in the course of performing official duties, and was registered as a soldier or policeman on the ground of a new physical examination after being judged at Grade VII703.
C. After that, on November 17, 2011, the Plaintiff filed an application with the Defendant for the recognition of “the loss of the function of reproductive technology, the left-hand return,” and on October 15, 2012, “the loss of the right-hand return and the right-hand return to the left-hand return” as an additional prize. However, on October 15, 201, the Plaintiff made a non-competent decision.
On January 23, 2013, the Plaintiff filed an application with the Defendant for additional recognition of major issues by different applications, and on June 18, 2013, the Defendant notified the Plaintiff of the result of an application for additional recognition of major issues (hereinafter “instant disposition”).
[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap's 5, 6 evidence, Eul's 1 to 11 (including additional numbers), the purport of the whole pleadings
2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful
A. The plaintiff asserted that the accident of this case where the plaintiff was entering the Gun and was shocked to the string plate of a gun while undergoing a new disease training, led to the occurrence of the string window and the string, which led to the string (hereinafter "the injury of this case"). The injury of this case occurred while serving in the military.