A Imprisonment with prison labor for ten months, for one year, for one year, and for six months, for each of the defendants C.

except that this shall not apply.

The defendant 2016 Highest 160 was aware of the fact that it is difficult to leave the Internet shopping mall operated by the defendant.

At the same time with B, there was intent to steal property by intrusion into vacant houses in which human resources, such as Gyeonggi Pyeong-gun, etc., are located rarely.

1. Special larceny Defendant and B shall enter the vinyl of the victim H management of the victim H located in Gyeonggi-si G on January 29, 2016, in which at least 18:50 on or around January 29, 2016, two persons shall be extracted from the market price that was located in the relevant place from the market price to the nearest nomenclature.

They go back.

Accordingly, the defendant stolen the victim's property together with B.

2. An attempted special thief;

A. On January 29, 2016, the Defendant and B infringed upon the victim J’s entire house located in Gyeonggi-si I, Gyeonggi-do, and attempted to steal the property in excess of the house’s length, but did not form the body of human beings.

B. Around 18:45 on the same day, the Defendant and B met the victim K’s house located in G, thereby infringing on the house in excess of the retaining wall adjacent to the main gate, thereby cutting down the surrounding areas, but did not bring about an attempted crime, even though model CCTV was installed.

(c)

The Defendant and B got into a house of the victim L located in the same G on the same day at around 19:00, and went through the entrance door of the first floor to steal the property, and did not remove the credit cooperative owned by the victim, which was located in the same place, due to the theft of the property from the inside of the second floor as described in the foregoing paragraph (1), but did not carry out an attempted attempt because there was no cash therein.

Accordingly, the defendant tried to steal the victims' property in collaboration with B, but did not achieve that intention, but did not commit an attempted crime.

Defendant B, “The 2016 Highest 234, 2016 Highest 2.34,” Defendant B, who had been invested by Defendant B or Defendant C, was unable to discontinue the Internet shopping mall, and the living environment was discussed.