Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

In E operated by the victim D at the time of residence on May 16, 2006, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant would pay the purchase price of agricultural chemicals to the victim who did not have the intent or ability to pay the purchase price even if he was supplied with agricultural materials, such as agrochemicals, etc. from the victim, and that the Defendant received from the victim a pesticide, etc. equivalent to KRW 36,800 in total of the market price of three hundred eight thousands, such as three-eights, from the place of the transaction, and from around that time to August 20, 206, it is apparent that “four of the KIKO entry system” in the item No. 10 items is a clerical error of “one floftk, four kil entry system,” so it is immediately correct without changing the indictment.

The victim was accused of the victim and received agricultural materials, such as agricultural chemicals equivalent to the total market value of KRW 1,429,00,000, from the victim over 13 times in total.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of the witness D;

1. D's statement among the police interrogation protocol against the defendant

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning details of transactions and daily bookkeeping copies;

1. Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

1. Article 186 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act to bear litigation costs;