교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The lower court’s sentencing (two years of the suspended sentence of October, community service order, 80 hours of community service order, and 40 hours of lecture order for compliance driving) based on the summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable.
2. Determination vehicles are covered by comprehensive insurance.
The Defendant agreed with the victim E, and deposited KRW 2.5 million for the victim G.
However, the Defendant caused the instant traffic accident due to the negligence of over-speed and the Central Line, and caused the victims to suffer approximately 8 weeks, and the victims suffered injury in need of medical treatment for about 10 weeks.
In full view of the following circumstances, including the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, family relationship, motive and background of the offense, means and consequence, etc., and the fact that there is no special circumstance or circumstance to change the sentencing of the lower court after the lower judgment, the lower court’s sentencing is not unfair.
3. The Defendant’s appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, on the grounds that the appeal is groundless.