요양불승인처분취소
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. Details of the disposition;
A. On July 21, 2014, the Plaintiff, as an employee affiliated with B (hereinafter referred to as the “Nonindicted Company”), experienced symptoms that the Plaintiff’s end-of-the-day horse is divided, and then went to the hospital during the driving, was granted a traffic accident and thereafter sent to the hospital 119-ro, and filed an application for medical care benefits with the Defendant.
B. The Defendant: (a) deemed that “the Plaintiff’s injury and disease in the instant case is confirmed, but no overwork or stress is recognized, and there is no causal link between the work branch of the instant case; and (b) rendered a disposition not to approve the said application (hereinafter the instant disposition).”
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap 1, Eul 8, the purport of the whole pleadings
2. Whether the disposition is lawful;
A. The Plaintiff asserted that the Plaintiff did not have a low-income disease that may cause the instant injury, such as high blood pressure and blood transfusion, and that an excessive work, in the interior of at least 35 degrees centigrade, particularly up to the time beyond the self-determination on July 15, 2014, and that the instant injury and disease occurred due to stress. Thus, the instant disposition that did not recognize the causal relationship between the operations of the instant injury and the instant injury and the instant injury and disease is unlawful.
(b) The details of the relevant statutes are as shown in the attached statutes.
C. On June 1, 2012, the Plaintiff entered the non-party company and carried out printed materials and production management work. Working hours are 08:30 to 18:30, and 5-6 working days per week.
B. On July 2017, 2014, the day preceding the outbreak of the instant injury, the Plaintiff was off on Sundays on the day before the outbreak of the instant injury. On July 21, 2014, the horse was divided into around 10:00 am on the day of the outbreak, and even around 12:0 am at around 12:0 am, the Plaintiff was solicited to return home from the company, but continued to work not later than 6:0 am on the day after the outing of the country, and the police officer was dispatched to the police officer who was dispatched due to the contact while driving the instant injury.