If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

The defendant, upon his introduction, was the co-defendants in B 2013 Highest 2995 case. He met with B and talked with him.

B was the escape after deceiving C introduced through the Defendant on July 2013, and acquired 300 million won as investment money for the business related to the sale and purchase of imported automobiles.

While the Defendant knew of the fact that he committed the above crime, but he received a request from B to “to create one mobile phone due to inconvenience in accompanying the network,” the Defendant opened a mobile phone in the name of his wife D around the bus end point No. 165, Sept. 17, 2013, which is located around the bus end point no. 165, which is located around the bus end point no. 165, Namyang-si, Namyang-si.

As a result, the defendant had a person who committed a crime corresponding to a fine or heavier punishment escape.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the police interrogation protocol concerning B to the police interrogation protocol

1. Relevant Article 151 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;