2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

A. The Plaintiffs, as foreigners of Chinese People’s Republic of China (hereinafter “China”), entered the Republic of Korea on November 5, 2014 with the Tourism Department (B-2) sojourn status, and filed an application for recognition of refugee status with the Defendant on the relevant date indicated in the column for the application for recognition of refugee status in the following table:

B. The Defendant rendered a decision to deny the status of refugee status on the pertinent date indicated in the following table: (a) on the ground that there is no “a sufficient well-founded fear that the Plaintiffs would be subject to persecution”; and (b) on the same day, each of the Plaintiffs

(hereinafter “each disposition of this case”). (c)

Accordingly, the plaintiffs raised an objection to the Minister of Justice on each date stated in the table of the next table, but the above objection was dismissed on each date stated in the notice of dismissal of the next table.

No. 14-2, No. 15-2, No. 2, No. 4-2, No. 15-2, No. 15-2, Nov. 1, 2015; and No. 2, No. 15-3, No. 14-2, Nov. 1, 2016; and No. 2, No. 15-3, No. 14-2, Nov. 2, 2015; and No. 15-2, No. 14-2, Nov. 1, 2015; and No. 3, No. 14-2, Nov. 1, 2015; and No. 1555-2, Nov. 1, 2014; and No. 2, 2014-2, No. 15-3, Nov. 1, 2015;

2. Whether each of the dispositions of this case is legitimate

A. The plaintiffs' assertion is against the respective dispositions of this case since the Chinese government could be frightened on the ground that they participated in the frightening activity if they return to frighten, as the Nrighten, as the Nrighten Han National Assembly (hereinafter referred to as the "N rightenung"), which was the Nung

B. The phrase “persecution” which is a requirement for recognition of refugee status 1 is a threat to life, body, or freedom.