2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. In the instant claim, the Plaintiff asserted that, on August 19, 2014 and August 20, 2014, the Plaintiff lent a sum of KRW 124 million to the Defendant and the Selection Party C (Divisions) on and around August 20, 2014, and sought a return of the solidarity of the said loan against the Defendants.

B. Therefore, it is difficult to readily believe that part of Gap 3's statements, which the plaintiff believed to support the facts of the cause of the claim in this case, are not sufficient to recognize this point solely with Gap 1, 2, and 4-6, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge this. Thus, all of the above arguments presented by the plaintiff are acceptable.

2. According to the conclusion, all of the Plaintiff’s claim for return of the instant loan cannot be accepted.