폭행등
Defendant
In addition, the appeal by the candidate for medical treatment and custody is dismissed.
1. The lower court rendered a judgment on the part of the Defendant’s case against the Defendant and the requester for medical treatment and custody (hereinafter “Defendant”) with respect to the part on the part on some of the victims of the Defendant’s case, the lower court rendered a judgment on the dismissal of public prosecution, the remaining part except the relevant part, and the part on the medical treatment
However, since only the defendant appealed on the part of the defendant's case and the medical treatment and custody claim case, the judgment dismissing the prosecution among the judgment below is excluded from the scope of the judgment of this court.
2. Summary of grounds for appeal;
A. The punishment of the court below (two years of imprisonment) related to the defendant's case is too unreasonable because it is too unreasonable.
On January 6, 2020, the Defendant appears to have indicated “the instant crime was committed in the state of mental disorder or mental disorder (the state of mental disorder or mental disorder)” that was printed on the summary of the grounds of appeal in the appellate brief submitted by the Defendant on January 6, 2020, and deemed to have indicated “the instant crime was committed in the state of mental disorder or mental disorder” as the grounds of appeal.
However, in light of the fact that the specific grounds for appeal written by the Defendant in writing on the above grounds for appeal contain grounds for unfair sentencing, and that the judgment of the court below recognizes the defendant's mental disability and imposed the punishment by reducing the law, it is reasonable to view that the defendant's assertion of mental disability as a mental and physical disability is sought to consider it as an ordinary relation, and therefore, it does not separately
B. The symptoms related to the medical treatment and custody claim (legal scenarios) of the defendant were improved due to the treatment during the period of detention after the crime of this case, and the defendant is expected to receive constant treatment of the above symptoms, so there is no need to receive medical treatment and custody or risk of recidivism.
However, the judgment of the court below that sentenced the medical treatment and custody of the defendant is the status of the defendant.