2. Although the defendant's mistake is divided and reflected in the judgment, the crime of this case is likely to be criticized in that the defendant habitually committed the crime of this case, committed a theft of the victims' belongings in the clothing room and warehouse, etc., stolen the stolen credit card and debit card, etc., and used the stolen credit card and debit card. Not only is the frequency of crime, but also the degree of damage is considerable, the defendant started to commit the crime of this case in only one week, whether he was released without being aware of even during the repeated period, and one week, and the defendant began to commit the crime of this case without being aware of it. The defendant agreed with the victims or failed to reimburse their damage until the trial, and all of the sentencing conditions in the records and arguments of this case are considered to be too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.