2. The judgment of the court below is unfair in light of the favorable circumstances that the defendant led to the confession and reflect of the crime in this case, the fact that there was a record of punishment several times of the same kind of crime, and the method of the commission of the crime, etc., and the fact that the damage has not been recovered is considered disadvantageous circumstances. The court below’s punishment is too unreasonable in light of the sentencing conditions, such as the defendant’s age, character and behavior, environment, circumstances leading to the crime, and circumstances after the crime.

There is no reason to view that the sentencing conditions have changed in the appellate court.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act because the defendant's appeal is without merit.