사기등
All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is unreasonable because it is too unreasonable that the sentence (Defendant D: 1,50,000 won of fine, Defendant F: 10 months of imprisonment, 2 years of suspended execution, 40 hours of a community service order, 160 hours of a community service order, Defendant N: one year and three months of suspended execution, 3 years of a community service order, 40 hours of a community service order, 200 hours of a community service order, 40 hours of a suspended execution, 2 years of a suspended execution, 40 hours of a community service order, 160 hours of a community service order, 4 months of a suspended execution, 1 year of a suspended execution, 40 hours of a community service order, and 120 hours of a community service order) that the court below
2. The defendants recognized the crime of this case and divided their mistakes, and the defendant T paid the amount of damage to some victims, and the rest of the defendants agreed with the victims.
However, the crime of this case is committed by the defendants in disguise of traffic accidents and by deceiving the victim insurance company with a considerable amount of insurance money. In particular, the defendant N has been punished for fraud. In full view of the fact that the defendant D and T have the record of being sentenced to a suspended sentence of imprisonment, and other circumstances that are the conditions for sentencing in this case, such as the defendants' age, character and conduct, environment, family relationship, etc., the punishment imposed by the court below against the defendants is too unreasonable. Thus, the defendants' above assertion is without merit.
3. As such, the Defendants’ appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since all of the appeals are without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.