2. The judgment of the court below committed the instant crime without being aware of the record of being sentenced to suspended sentence due to the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, family relationship, and circumstances after the crime, etc., in full view of various circumstances that are conditions for sentencing specified in the instant case, such as the Defendant’s age, character and behavior, family relationship, and circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable, in view of the following: (a) the Defendant found the Defendant according to the C district located in Sinsan City B, and deemed to have expressed a desire to the victim, who is the police, as the Defendant was found to have taken care of the crime; (b) the Defendant did not reach an agreement with the victim up to the trial; and (c) the Defendant committed the instant crime without being aware of the record of being sentenced to suspended sentence due to injury, etc.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.