If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

1. On June 24, 2018, at around 20:50, the Defendant: (a) entered the main point of “C” operated by the Victim B (PP) (PP) to “C; (b)” and, at around 20:50, the Defendant: (c) took the place of the victim’s speech that “a business operation is difficult; (d)” from the victim; and (e) took the place of the victim’s name while drinking; and (e) went to the employees of the said main point where the name is unknown.

When the victim’s wife was required to calculate, “Ackh” refers to “Ackh” and “Ackhnhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhn

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's main business by force.

2. On June 24, 2018, at the main points indicated in paragraph 1, around 21:30 on June 24, 2018, the Defendant: (a) received a report from the Defendant to the effect that “a person interfering with his/her business” was “a person interfering with his/her business; and (b) received a request from the police officer F to verify his/her personal information from the police officer of the Gyeonggi Police Station E District; (c) said police officer called “a request to present his/her identification card”; (d) said police officer presented his/her public official identification card; and (e) said, the Defendant carried the above public official

In addition, when the police officer demanded the return of public official's evidence from the police officer, the police officer took a bath, such as "Chewing shots, shots", etc., and obstructed the chest side of the police officer once.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with police officers' legitimate performance of official duties in relation to the prevention and suppression of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. The criminal place;

1. A written statement in B, D, and G;

1. On-site photographs;

1. Application of the law of the statement protocol with respect to F, B, and D;

1. Article 314(1) and Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act of the same Act concerning facts constituting an offense (Interference with the performance of official duties) and Article 136(1) of the same Act, each of them shall be selected.