From early 2010 to July 2012, the Defendant: (a) was a person in charge of general management of the withdrawals by soliciting and withdrawing accounts for foreign exchange transactions in order for them to safely withdraw the money acquired through hacking and fraudulent crimes against financial institutions in the Republic of Korea; (b) C, D, and E, under the direction of the Defendant respectively; (c) was a person in charge of soliciting accounts for foreign exchange transactions and withdrawing the money acquired through the money transferred to the said account; and (c) was a person who was in charge of soliciting accounts for foreign exchange transactions while receiving the Defendant’s order and exchanging the money obtained through the above foreign exchange transaction account into USD; and (d) G was a person who was in charge of raising accounts for foreign exchange transactions in collusion with the Defendant, who was called “H” in the Republic of Korea as a member of the international financial crime organization of ASEAN.

In the U.S. financial institution, a member who has purchased a house-backed loan product operates a loan product "hte (HEOC)" that takes place only with the receipt of documents related to the loan application and the confirmation of the intention of additional loan by telephone. The "hte (HEOC) loan product" has an institutional defect that could easily cause fraudulent damage by means of name appearance and identification number change if the personal information of a financial institution is leaked.

At around 209, G, which recognized these institutional problems, and ASEAN's staff who are engaged in activities in the U.S. financial crime organization, proposed that the defendant would pay a certain amount of the remittance in return for the solicitation of the account if he/she solicits the holders of the foreign exchange transaction account that can safely withdraw the fraudulent crime and the corporate e-mail acquired by hacking against financial institutions in the U.S., and the defendant would be the defendant.