Around 01:58 on August 13, 2017, the Defendant reported a 1112-report with C et al. on the street in front of 01:58, the Defendant: (a) was under the influence of alcohol in front of 01:58; (b) the police officer affiliated with the D District District of the Gando Police Station, called the Defendant upon receipt of a report; (c) the Defendant was asked for the details of the report; (d) the Defendant was able to ask the Defendant of the report; (d) the Defendant was frighted; (d) the offender was frighted; (d) the offender was frighted; and (e) the Defendant was fluored by the fluor; (e) the Defendant was fluored by fluor; and (e) the Defendant was fluored by f

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each police interrogation protocol against the accused;

1. Each police statement of E;

1. Written statements of C,F and G;

1. Photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing the 112 Reporting Case Handling Table;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of punishment for the crime, the choice of punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;