2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by each party.

purport, purport, and.

A. On May 10, 2012 under the Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents (hereinafter “Urban Improvement Act”) for a housing reconstruction project (hereinafter “instant reconstruction project”) consisting of a project implementation district of the Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government 172,040.06 square meters (hereinafter “instant project area”), the Defendant is a partnership that obtained authorization to establish a partnership from the head of Seocho-gu Office on May 10, 2012, and the Plaintiffs are companies registered as a rearrangement project manager or companies deemed registered as a rearrangement project manager under the Urban Improvement

(Article 69 (1) of the Urban Improvement Act, Article 63 (2) of the Enforcement Decree of the Urban Improvement Act). (b)

In around 1974, the Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Committee for Promotion was mixed with the apartment houses and the apartment houses that were built on the housing land created by a land readjustment project for completion in 1974. A part of the housing owners organized the "C Apartment Building Promotion Committee" in order to reconstruct the apartment houses and the apartment houses that were built in the first place in the project area of this case into the apartment houses (multi-unit houses). On October 2000, the name was changed to the "C Urban Development Promotion Committee" (amended by Act No. 6406, Jan. 29, 2001) for the reconstruction of apartment houses (amended by Act No. 6406, Jul. 2003; hereinafter referred to as the "C Housing Building Promotion Committee").

C. (1) The instant provisional name promotion committee selected the Plaintiff Korea Appraisal Board Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Plaintiff Korea Appraisal Board”) as a consulting service provider for the project management of an urban development project. On November 16, 2000, the instant provisional name promotion committee entered into a contract with Plaintiff Korea Appraisal Board for the project management of an urban development project with the main contents as follows.

Contract amount: Subsequent consultation decision at the time of this contract, Article 3 (Scope and Consideration of Project Management) (1) of the A.