사기등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
Seized evidence 1 to 9 shall be confiscated.
Punishment of the crime
1. Fraud;
A. On October 2013, the Defendant introduced the victim C from the scopic scopic scopic scopic point near the Yanam-si, Sungnam-si, by introducing the victim C, the Defendant stated that the victim himself was a medical specialist in the scopic surgery of the scopic University Hospital, and that he was the victim’s property of KRW 00 million in the number of grandchildren other than the E, who
In addition, the defendant and the victim's family members were introduced through the role intermediary company to trust the defendant's mother G role and H's father I role as the defendant's mother. On October 2014, the defendant made a false statement that he promised to marry with the victim's family members and marriage with the victim on April 25, 2015.
However, there was no intention to report marriage to the spouse, and the defendant was not the father of the father who was married, but was not the son of the E, and there was no property of the E, and there was no promise to set the crypton of the E, and there was no promise to do so.
On November 20, 2014, the Defendant received 1,215,000,000,000,000,000,000 from the injured party for the purpose of marriage, and received from the injured party for the purpose of purchase of visual materials on December 30, 2014, 200,000,000 for the purpose of prevaluating around March 20, 2015, 3,81,000,000,000 for the market price as well as 3,81,000,000,000 for the purpose of wedding, respectively, and received the cash and property in total equivalent to 75,026,000,00.
B. On June 2015, the Defendant concluded that “The Defendant would withdraw the deposit after the fine is paid and resolve all the problem of money if the Defendant borrowed the money that would be able to withdraw if the Defendant paid the fine to a police officer since the withdrawal of the deposit was suspended due to the suspension of withdrawal of the financial account.”
However, the defendant did not have a deposit of 11.8 billion won, and even if he borrowed money from the victim, he did not have an intention or ability to pay it.
The defendant belongs to this.