When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The Defendant was a victim C (37 Dose) who was working in the kitchen located in the D cafeteria operated by the Defendant, and E (23 Dose) is a person working in this cafeteria.

On November 29, 2017, from around 19:10 to 19:26 of the same day, the Defendant worked at the D restaurant operated by F Victim C in Gwangju Dong-gu, Gwangju, and from around 19:10 to around 19:26 of the same day, on the same day, but at this time, E, a main room, did not go to himself, and returned to him, and he was found to be without permission, and on the ground that ordinary E sent the horse to himself, the Defendant: “I am feb feb feb feb feb feb h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h k h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h, h h h h h h h h, and h h h h h h h h h h h h h h.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of police statement protocol to C and E;

1. Article 314 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act - Reasons for sentencing favorable to the defendant under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act - The defendant's mistake is recognized, the victim does not want the defendant's punishment, and the defendant has no record of punishment since 2004 - The part dismissing public prosecution that is not good for the reason that the defendant's misconduct is recognized, the defendant does not want to be punished, and the defendant has no record of punishment since 204 - The defendant is forced to escape

1. The summary of the facts charged is the date and time stated in the above facts charged.