beta
(영문) 서울고등법원 2016.07.05 2016누36262

보상금 증액

Text

1. The plaintiffs' appeal and the defendant's appeal against plaintiffs C and D are all dismissed.

2. The expansion from the trial.

Reasons

1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case are as follows: each "this court" of the first instance court of the first instance 8, 6-18, and 9-2 of the first instance judgment ; each "this court" of the fourth 20, 7-18, and 9-14 of the fourth 4, 20, 7-18, and 9-14 of the second 14 of the first 10 judgment ; each "the date of this decision" "the date of the first 17-2 of the sixth 17-2" ; "the sixth 16-16-2" ; "(c)" of the seventh 16-21-2" ; "(c)" of the first 81-21-21-C ; and "the judgment against the plaintiff Eul 1-2" of the first 9-21-C ; and therefore, it is identical with the reasons for the judgment of the first 1-20-20 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. As to the plaintiff B's argument of the trial of the court of appeal, although the land owned by the plaintiff B in the "land subject to expropriation" in the annexed list of compensation details in the judgment of the court of first instance was completed, the appraiser of the court of first instance assessed the land as forest land and assessed at a price significantly lower than the miscellaneous value in a similar neighboring form. Thus, there is no evidence to acknowledge that the land owned by the plaintiff B was completed at the time of the decision to expropriate the land. Thus, the plaintiff B's above assertion is without merit.

3. As a result, the claims of plaintiffs A, C, E, and F, among the plaintiffs' claims prior to their expansion in the trial, are accepted on the grounds of the above recognition, and the remaining claims of plaintiffs D are accepted on the grounds of the reasons within the above recognition scope, and they are dismissed on the grounds of the reasons. The plaintiff B's claims are justified, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and they are dismissed on the grounds that the appeal against the plaintiffs, plaintiffs C, and D is dismissed, and the claims of the plaintiffs extended in the trial of the court of first instance are dismissed on the grounds of the reasons. It is so decided as per Disposition.