위증
Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.
However, two years from the date when each of the above judgments became final and conclusive against the Defendants.
Punishment of the crime
[criminal power] Defendant B was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for a year of imprisonment with labor for a violation of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse (sexual Purchase, etc.) in the 17 October 2019, at the Busan District Court’s Net Branch, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on October 25, 2019.
1. On June 18, 2019, around 10:00, the Defendant appeared as a witness of the defendant's case, including minor legal rape with respect to the above court 2019 high-priced58, etc., at the law court of Gwangju District Court 316, which was located in king-si, Gwangju District Court 10:00, and the defense counsel responded to the question, "I am at around 00:30 on October 27, 2018 (the place of criminal conduct) at the house of the witness at around 00:30 on May 27, 201, and the prosecutor confirmed that "I am at around 01:00 on October 27, 2018 and the defendant (C) did not come to the house."
“The testimony was made again to the effect that the testimony was made.
However, the defendant and C did not have a residential place in October 27, 2018 for the purpose of moving to a leisure port around 01:00.
Nevertheless, the Defendant made a false statement contrary to memory in the above court, thereby perjury.
2. On August 22, 2019, Defendant B appeared as a witness of the above Defendant case at the court of 316 around 15:00, and testified that “I am dice by the presiding judge (C and A) after the prosecutor appeared to take an oath, I directly saw “I am d't I am d'. I am d'. I am d'. I am d'(C and A) with the Defendant at around 01:00 on October 27, 2018.”
However, in fact C and A did not have been present at around 00:20 on October 27, 2018 or around 01:00, for the purpose of moving to a female-water port, and therefore there was no fact that the defendant had observed this.
Nevertheless, the defendant is against memory in the above court.