If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

On August 6, 2013, the Defendant received medical treatment from the victim C (Nam & 45 years of age) who is a dentist, and judged that the treatment was wrong, and had good appraisal against the victim, such as resisting the victim.

1. Interference with business;

A. On August 23, 2014, the Defendant committed the crime of August 23, 2014: (a) was unable to file a disturbance for about 30 minutes in the E dental clinic operated by the said victim C, which was located in Sincho-si during the hours of medical examination and treatment, by demanding refund of medical expenses to the victim; (b) “to file a complaint”; and (c) “to file a complaint every day until receiving money.”

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the patient treatment of the victim by force.

B. On August 28, 2014, the Defendant committed the crime of August 28, 2014: (a) around 16:10, at the place indicated in paragraph (a) of Article 1; (b) on the grounds that the said victim erred in the treatment of the Defendant, it was difficult for the Defendant to have avoided disturbance for about one hour for about 1 hours, including the victim’s “I would die promptly on the face of the Defendant; (c) whether I do not have to die; and (d) the instant victim’s mistake in the treatment of the Defendant.”

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the patient treatment of the victim by force.

C. The Defendant committed the crime of August 29, 2014, committed around 16:15, 2014. Around August 29, 2014, it was difficult for the Defendant to bring a disturbance for about 30 minutes, including the following: (a) around 16:15, at the place specified in paragraph (a) of Article 1; (b) the said victim demanded the victim to have the medical records recorded; (c)

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the patient treatment of the victim by force.

2. On September 4, 2014, the Defendant: (a) threatened the victim with the victim by stating that “the victim would throw away shots, shots, snows,” on the ground that the victim would not have been found at the hospital during telephone conversations with the said victim at a noon-site location; (b) on the ground that the victim’s speech at the time of diagnosis and treatment.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. C’s legal statement;

1. One set of diagnosis and treatment sets and e-mail transmission data;

1. A victim;