사문서위조등
[Defendant A] The Defendant is not guilty (Defendant B). The Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.
except that this judgment.
The crime history room (Defendant B) was the owner of the Suwon-si District C, and the construction of the site for electric source housing (hereinafter “instant electric source housing site”) was carried out on one lot outside the above land and two lots, and the Defendant is a person who has contracted out the civil construction works on access roads to the said site for electric source housing.
In order to have A reduce or exempt capital gains tax imposed on A in the course of selling a site for the foregoing electric source to another person, the Defendant, despite that A did not enter into a contract for civil construction work with D as the contractor, and did not obtain D’s consent and consent to the preparation of the standard contract form in the name of D, the Defendant was willing to prepare and submit a standard contract form to the tax office.
On October 30, 2013, the Defendant sent to A the file of “Standard Contract for Private Construction Works” described in the “G” and “D” column in the contractor address column in the Gyeonggi-do E building F, the resident number column, by e-mail.
1. From November 201, 2013 to December 2, 2013, the Defendant forged private documents: (a) from the beginning of the construction site office of the HEA site of the HEA site in Yongsan-si District to A, the Defendant affixed a DNA seal attached to the said D’s name attached to the file output of the said standard contract, which was sent by the Defendant to A, together with A at the construction site office of the HE site of the construction site of the HA site;
Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged one copy of the standard contract for private construction works in the name of D, a private document related to rights and obligations (hereinafter “the standard contract”).
2. On December 3, 2013, the Defendant of the instant contract for the instant case, which was forged as set forth in Section 1(a) of the said Article, was sent to the employees of the said tax office, who knew of the forgery, as the same as that of Section 1(a) in Suwon-gu, Suwon-gu, Suwon-gu, Suwon-do.