However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant is a person who operates a sexual traffic business establishment in Pyeongtaek-si B, equipped with a shower facility, and called "C".

In spite of the fact that anyone is prohibited from engaging in the act of arranging sexual traffic for business purposes, the defendant employed a female employee D at the above sexual traffic business establishment around March 16, 2017, and arranged the act of arranging sexual traffic for business purposes from March 14, 2017 to the above date after receiving KRW 120,000 in return for sexual traffic from male customers who found the above business establishment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Application of statutes governing field enforcement photographs;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as Mediation, etc. of elective sexual traffic for facts constituting an offense, and Article 19 (2) 1 of the same Act and selection of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Taking into account all the factors of sentencing, such as the fact that there is a record of being sentenced to a fine for the commission of sexual traffic in the same place as the reasons of sentencing in Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act for the protection and observation, and the fact that the crime is divided, the scale of business, age and health conditions of the accused, and