beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.11.23 2016고단5657

공무집행방해등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On July 12, 2016, around 23:55, the Defendant violated the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act (mix disturbance disturbance) : (a) around the 103 entrance of Suwon-gu Apartment-gu apartment 103 entrance, the Defendant dumped down mailed an apartment with drinking water on the floor; (b) spiting the door on the floor of the entrance, spiting the door on the entrance; and (c) spiting the door on the entrance, walking the staff of the said apartment management office and two residents; and (d) dump the surrounding employees of the said apartment management office with the desire to “the same fump or bitch bitch” in front of the two residents.

2. On July 13, 2016, around 00:30 on July 13, 2016, the victim E (the age of 37) who was a police officer belonging to the above D police box, was arrested as a flagrant offender at the Suwon-nam Police Station D police box located in Suwon-gu, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, and D police station, which was arrested as a flagrant offender, destroyed the victim’s head as soon as possible in order for the victim to fix the Defendant’s lock to his will.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers regarding the arrest of flagrant offenders, and at the same time, inflicted an injury on the victim, such as scambling, etc. requiring medical treatment for 14 days.

3. On July 13, 2016, at around 00:55, the Defendant damaged public goods, when he was sent to the police station of the Suwon-nam Police Station in order to transport the equipment to the police station of the Suwon-nam Police Station, the Defendant: (a) destroyed the 55,00 won of the repair cost of the patrol vehicle by walking the window of the patrol vehicle at several times; and (b) destroyed the lower part of the patrol seat of the patrol vehicle.

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the use of goods by public offices, thereby harming their utility.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. The police statement of E and G;

1. A H statement;

1. Written estimate of repair costs and written diagnosis of injury of the patrolr;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning field photographs, photographs of each damage therefrom, and CCTV images;

1. Relevant provisions of Article 3(1)20 (a) of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act, Article 136(1) (a) of the Criminal Act, Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;