When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

The Defendant is a business owner who operates commercial sex acts in officetels under the trade name of “B” and “C.”

From July 10, 2017 to July 27, 2017, the Defendant employed the female workers engaged in sexual traffic in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Dtel 505 and 1411. After advertising the said trade name’s sexual traffic business establishment through the Internet website of the commercial entertainment business establishment, the Defendant provided guidance to the officetels room with female employees, and the female employees received the said amount of KRW 80,000 to 110,000 from male customers to 10,000,000,000,000,0000,000,000,000,0000,000,000,000,000,000,0000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00,00.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of each police suspect with respect to F, G, I, and H;

1. Each lease agreement;

1. Application of separate photographs of sexual traffic and photographs at control sites;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 and Article 24 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc., concerning facts constituting an offense, and Articles 19 (2) 1 and 24 of the same Act;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 62 (1) and (2) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act;

1. Advertisement activities or mediation activities using a medium with high propagation in the aggravated area (one year to three years) (one year to three years) of two types (one year to three years), such as brokerage activities, etc. for commercial sex acts subject to the age of 19 or older, the brokerage of commercial sex acts, etc.;

2. The crime of this case in which the sentence of sentence was determined.