2. The following facts are revealed: (a) the Defendant led to the instant crime; (b) the Defendant made a confession of the instant crime; (c) the Defendant’s health is not good; and (d) the Defendant seems to have no record of being punished as an act of arranging sexual traffic; (c) however, in light of the legislative intent of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic to eradicate the act of arranging sexual traffic, the Defendant has no record of being punished several times due to the crime of violating the Food Sanitation Act; (d) the Defendant has a record of being punished several times; (e) balance between other similar cases and sentencing; (e) the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, motive for the instant crime; and (e) circumstances after the instant crime, it cannot be deemed that the lower court’

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.