When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

1. On September 25, 2017, from around 02:39 to 03:06 of the same day, the Defendant violated the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act: (a) visited the said police box at the Seoul Dongdaemun-gu Police Station C police box located in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul to normally pay the taxi fare at the recommendation of the police officer assigned to the said police box and the police officer, and (b) was urged by the said police officer to return home from the police officer during the influence of alcohol, and (c) during the influence of alcohol, the Defendant sent the police box to the said police officer under the influence of alcohol, stating, “The police officer will fright his citizen, fright him to fright, fright a bitch, fright a bitch, fright a bitch,” and, at the same time, fright the police officer went back to the said police box at the entrance of the said police box to have him returned to the Republic of Korea.

2. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties, at the time and place specified in the above paragraph (1) above, was arrested as a flagrant offender in violation of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act, such as Paragraph (1) above, and refused to board the patrol vehicle in the course of the patrol vehicle 51, and was placed as a head of F’s chest belonging to the Seoul Eastern Police Station, which prevented the Defendant from getting up to the lower seat of the patrol vehicle 51, and assaulted the above F’s breast at several times during the patrol vehicle 21-gil, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, and being escorted to the Seoul Eastern Police Station at approximately 29-ro, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul. On the same day, the Defendant continued to assault the above F, while being escorted to the police station around 03:19 on the same day, and “pick up until the end, flap will put it up, flap, flap, and flap.

Until the end of the width, it was threatened by the expression "......"

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers on the suppression and control of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to G, F, and H;

1. CCTV.