beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.09.29 2016고단4009

공기호부정사용등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On February 2, 2016, the Defendant: (a) at a 711-bebenes apartment 105 underground parking lot, as the wife population, in the early Mandong 105 Sinman, the Defendant: (b) removed the above number plate from the bVS125 Orala, which was left away without authority for the purpose of exercising; and (c) instead of a number plate attached to the Defendant’s possession at a approximately five meters away from the penttoma, the Defendant denied the number plate of the two-wheeled automobile, which is air, by attaching the above number plate to the Mas 125EFI Maba; and (d) the Defendant used the number plate of the two-wheeled automobile.

2. The Defendant, at the above day from around June 14, 201 to June 14, 201, operated the above Oba, where the above number plate is attached, and exercised the air defense that was illegally used by women.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. A certificate of disuse of use of a two-wheeled motor vehicle, certificate of transfer of a motor vehicle (the transferor and transferee's direct transaction), photograph, and written inquiry into a motor vehicle;

1. Application of the statutes on seizure records and the list of seizure lists;

1. Article 238 (1) of the Criminal Act (Unlawful Use of Official Marks) concerning the facts constituting an offense, Article 238 (2) and Article 238 (1) of the Criminal Act (the use of unlawful exercise of air defense);

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 62 (1)