However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of a DNA car.

On January 8, 2014, the Defendant came to turn to the left from the front-gu, Seocheon-si, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City on the road of 244, the middle-gu, the main body of which is to turn to the left.

At the time, the location is an intersection with a crosswalk, so there was a duty of care to check whether a person engaged in driving is a person crossing the front side of the course, and to check whether he/she is a person crossing the front side of the course.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and neglected to turn to the left as it is, and instead, received the victim E (the age of 33) who was standing on the right side from the left side of the defendant's moving direction to the front side of the vehicle of the defendant.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered a serious injury to the victim due to the above occupational negligence, such as the injury to the left-hand pelke, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement concerning F;

1. The actual condition of traffic accidents;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) and Article 3 (6) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to Relevant Acts concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (the circumstances favorable to the defendant among the reasons for sentencing) of the suspended sentence is that the defendant driving a motor vehicle without sufficiently examining the right and the right and the right and the right of the defendant, and suffered serious injury to the victim who dried the crosswalk according to the pedestrian signal. However, the crime of this case is not easy, but it is against the defendant's confession and mistake. In this court, the defendant made a confession of the crime of this case and reflects the mistake. The victim does not want the punishment, the vehicle of the defendant does not want it, the vehicle of the defendant is covered by a comprehensive insurance, there is no record of punishment exceeding the fine, and the defendant's age, character and behavior