However, the above sentence shall be executed for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Defendants, at around 04:55 on January 30, 2016, thrown away from “G” located in Suwon-si F, Suwon-si on January 30, 2016, the victim H (56 tax and south) before the store, and thrown the wall behind the store.

Defendant D reported the network, and Defendant A stolen the victim’s wall 300,000 won in cash by holding the victim’s wall her wall her wall with the victim’s wall her wall.

As a result, the defendants stolen the victim's property together.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A statement prepared by H;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to CCTV data in special theft cases;

1. Defendants of the relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts: Articles 331(2) and 331(1) of the Criminal Act

1. Small-scale mitigated Defendants: Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 53 and 55(1)3)

1. Defendants who hold a suspended sentence: Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Concurrent consideration of the grounds for reduction of the amount of the said punishment);

1. Defendant A who observe the protection: It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of not less than two reasons under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;